Xiaomi Pad 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemXiaomi Pad 5  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft K82
Memory0.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 2560 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 17 '23 at 13:38
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Snapdragon 860
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
26% Poor
Memory 35.2
1-Core 28.3
2-Core 55.5
24% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 97.5
8-Core 98.6
13% 98.1 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung KLUEG8UHDC-B0E1 254GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 409 343 401 399 439 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.2% Average
Read 14
Write 408
Mixed 358
SusWrite 394
68% 294 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 15.9
46% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 75.2
DQ Mixed 83.6
64% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 80%
Samsung KLUEG8UHDC-B0E1 2GB
0GB free
Firmware: 0200
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 454
Write 343
Mixed 286
269% 361 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 15
2,583% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 81.2
DQ Mixed 93.2
880% 99 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Bank 0 Not Specified 1x6GB
1 of 1 slots used
6GB Row of chips LPDDR4 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.4% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 17.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 3.1
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 253
16% 253 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 0" 1280 720
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback