Today's hottest deals

Acer Veriton M200-H510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Veriton M200-H510  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer H510MHP-E
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '23 at 10:15
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 220
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 636
65% 523 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Biostar(1565 111A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
4.01% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 7.1
5% 5.8 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.01%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
452GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 143 151 156 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 167
Write 142
Mixed 79
SusWrite 140
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ACPI Digital Co Ltd 7D402283 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.3% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 9.7
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 19.5" 1280 720 ACR032C Acer V206HQL
Typical Veriton M200-H510 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M200-H510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback