Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83AX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230314
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateOct 06 '23 at 17:58
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 78.1
2-Core 139
53% 92.1 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 542
48% 407 Pts
64-Core 829
51% 829 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RadeonT 680M
Legend(17AA 381F) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.44.38
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.1% Poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 45
20% 36 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 28.2
Splatting 37.6
23% 26.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1006P7LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 847 874 827 952 1056 727 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,353
Write 858
Mixed 1,108
SusWrite 880
235% 1,050 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 39
128% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 450
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 402
269% 331 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 161%
Great: 430%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 32.4
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 22.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 14.5" 1280 720 LEN89C1
Typical 83AX Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 83AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback