Gigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive386% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '23 at 22:59
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$230
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 79.5
1-Core 166
2-Core 250
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 1,063
94% 797 Pts
64-Core 1,921
119% 1,921 Pts
Poor: 93%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZPLJ1T6HBJR-00007 1.5TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EPK9CB5Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2314 2309 2322 2323 2322 2313 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
386% Outstanding
Read 1,637
Write 2,426
Mixed 1,803
SusWrite 2,317
464% 2,046 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 83
296% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,984
DQ Write 1,998
DQ Mixed 1,980
1,491% 1,988 MB/s
Poor: 244%
This bench: 386%
Great: 386%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
41GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 7
Mixed 14.7
34% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.9
126% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX5M2B5200C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
157% Outstanding
MC Read 57.9
MC Write 56.7
MC Mixed 55.1
162% 56.6 GB/s
SC Read 54.4
SC Write 58.4
SC Mixed 48.5
154% 53.8 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 132%
This bench: 157%
Great: 187%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24" 1280 720 CHD0240 DM-MONF2410
Typical GA-X670 GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 313%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 330%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback