TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 82VG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics7.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82VG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '23 at 16:27
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 7120U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
25.7% Poor
Memory 37.8
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 80
40% 65.8 Pts
4-Core 81
8-Core 77.5
11% 79.2 Pts
64-Core 85.5
5% 85.5 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 25.7%
 Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RadeonT 610M
Legend(17AA 380E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.9.3
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.03% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 11.7
5% 9.57 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 18.7
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 7.03%
 Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ128MEE1MWX 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.1C0628
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 116 125 141 165 194 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.6% Below average
Read 188
Write 121
Mixed 222
SusWrite 149
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 8.6
31% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 103
81% 115 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 31.6%
 Great: 177%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNBK3MLYR-N6E 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.7% Poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.2
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 0.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 287
14% 287 ns
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 23.7%
 Great: 80%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 23 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9050
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 82VG Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82VG

CPU
Ryzen 3 7320U GraphicsAMDBench 52%, 1,118 samples43x
Ryzen 5 7520U GraphicsAMDBench 53%, 1,439 samples22x
Athlon Silver 7120U GraphicsAMDBench 24%, 73 samples14x
GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 2,063 samples69x
RadeonT 610MAMDBench 6%, 75 samples11x
SSD
MTFDKCD512QFM-1BD1AABLA 512GBMicronBench 174%, 1,136 samples26x
MZAL4256HBJD-00BL2 256GBSamsungBench 146%, 356 samples18x
RPJTJ128MEE1MWX 128GBUmisBench 123%, 883 samples12x
RAM
K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 2x4GBSamsungBench 61%, 958 samples31x
MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 2x4GBMicronBench 64%, 254 samples27x
H9JCNNNBK3MLYR-N6E 2x2GBHynixBench 53%, 49 samples9x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback