Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware20,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1714 x 874 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '23 at 05:32
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H Graphics
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 65.5
1-Core 151
2-Core 279
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 361
48% 362 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 768MB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 9.17.4.2
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 74.7
21% 44 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 23.8
23% 28.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 22%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 69GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,135
Write 893
Mixed 899
217% 976 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 26.7
90% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 1.2
58% 144 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB 1x4GB
1 of 128 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 45.4
MC Write 46.2
MC Mixed 40.2
126% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 25.3
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 116%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 1R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 11% 45 160 3 60 0" 1371 628 Default
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,995 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback