Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive379% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 17:52
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$348
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 186
2-Core 357
113% 211 Pts
4-Core 692
8-Core 1,191
114% 942 Pts
64-Core 1,666
103% 1,666 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 111%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$761
Asus(1043 88DC) ≥ 4GB; tuff
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.42
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 356
Reflection 341
Parallax 365
290% 354 fps
Gravity 297
Splatting 213
220% 255 fps
Poor: 208% Great: 256%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108
870GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2507 2465 2362 2444 2103 1466 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
379% Outstanding
Read 2,510
Write 2,793
Mixed 2,686
SusWrite 2,224
577% 2,553 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 77
262% 90.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,589
DQ Write 1,207
DQ Mixed 1,386
1,040% 1,394 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 379%
Great: 477%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B5600C36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
187% Outstanding
MC Read 75.2
MC Write 63.7
MC Mixed 67
196% 68.6 GB/s
SC Read 52.7
SC Write 63.1
SC Mixed 58.6
166% 58.1 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 131%
This bench: 187%
Great: 187%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACI22D3 ASUS VS229
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $2,392
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback