Hasee CNH5S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHasee CNH5S  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook CNH5S
Memory14.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '23 at 22:33
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 66.1
1-Core 147
2-Core 289
88% 167 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 926
92% 749 Pts
64-Core 1,359
84% 1,359 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 50E2) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3742
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.4% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 114
Parallax 110
96% 114 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 91.7
Splatting 81.1
82% 103 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison CFESR512GMTCT-E9C-2 512GB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM31.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2766 2355 1516 157 162 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 1,531
Write 2,873
Mixed 1,541
SusWrite 1,186
404% 1,783 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 81.6
307% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,396
DQ Write 1,119
DQ Mixed 1,232
929% 1249 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 284%
Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FR 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
61.5% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 18.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 14.8
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 14 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD05E5
Typical CNH5S Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

System: Hasee CNH5S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback