Supermicro H8DG6/H8DGi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemSupermicro H8DG6/H8DGi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H8DG6/H8DGi
Memory91.5 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '23 at 17:37
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron 6380
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 58
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 99.7
42% 69.8 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 346
33% 271 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 58%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec RAID 0 1TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 25 27 25 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.5% Poor
Read 70.7
Write 35.1
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 25
30% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 143%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CK0 6x16GB
6 of 16 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.8% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 14.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 9
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 4 3 0 0" 1280 720
Typical H8DG6/H8DGi Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: Supermicro H8DG6/H8DGi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback