Asus P8H67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67 (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130912
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 07 '23 at 09:52
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	60%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$191 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 81.1 2-Core 157 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 353 39% 308 Pts	64-Core 405 25% 405 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6850 31,600 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Asus(1043 03B4) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Lighting 15.9 Reflection 17.8 Parallax 14.4 13% 16 fps	MRender 12.3 Gravity 11.7 Splatting 10.3 9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 30 31 28 31 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Seagate ST3320813AS 320GB 4,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 22GB free Firmware: HP14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 101 100 100 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 96.6 Write 95.1 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 96.2 62% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 65%
Seagate Expansion HDD 1TB 274 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 281GB free Firmware: 1901 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 29 Write 29.5 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 28 21% 28 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.5 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	44.7% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 14 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 14.3 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	60	34.1"	2560 1080	GSM5BB9 LG HDR WFHD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 979 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	165x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	115x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	104x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	67x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	20x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	18x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	16x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $429

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16