Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
MemoryWindows (Unknown Version) has very low RAM requirements but the operating system desperately requires an upgrade for both security and usability reasons.
OS VersionWindows (Unknown Version) is not installed correctly. This system should be upgraded to at least Windows 8.1. (Note: a minimum of of 1GB of RAM is recommended for Windows 7, 8.1 and 10)
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
Motherboard
Memory9.2 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows (Unknown Version)
BIOS Date
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 07 '16 at 09:34
Run Duration37 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU-1%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 0 GHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 73.7
1-Core 33.1
2-Core 65.1
40% 57.3 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 178
19% 152 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 100%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.7% Poor
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.6
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback