Today's hottest deals

Machenike L16A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMachenike L16A  (all builds)
MotherboardMachenike L16A
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230508
Uptime10.4 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 23:12
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 53.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 272
76% 149 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 739
61% 532 Pts
64-Core 1,114
69% 1,114 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Device(1E50 8018) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.26
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.9% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 41.6
Parallax 57.8
27% 44.2 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 36.5
Splatting 44
30% 34.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ymtc PC300-512GB-B 512GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: YM0500C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1422 1516 1520 1769 1843 1800 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,748
Write 1,072
Mixed 1,249
SusWrite 1,645
321% 1,429 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 29
122% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 570
DQ Write 446
DQ Mixed 552
401% 523 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 230%
Great: 350%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D2DS-026 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
68.8% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 26.8
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 13.6
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 163 51 120 16" 1707 1067 BOE0AC1
Typical L16A Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Machenike L16A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback