Today's hottest deals

Micro F7BSC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro F7BSC  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BSC
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 18:55
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 59.3
1-Core 184
2-Core 366
103% 203 Pts
4-Core 734
8-Core 1,382
126% 1,058 Pts
64-Core 1,646
102% 1,646 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
AMD(1002 0124) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.40.03.38
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
48.8% Average
Lighting 56.3
Reflection 24.1
Parallax 87.9
46% 56.1 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 72.9
Splatting 89.4
54% 62.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 1TB
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,324
Write 2,524
Mixed 1,877
432% 1,909 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 77.4
267% 96.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,404
DQ Write 454
DQ Mixed 1,320
871% 1,059 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 415%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD56S46BD8HA-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 36.2
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 28.6
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 167%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1920 1080 DEL4241 DELL P2722H
Typical F7BSC Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Micro F7BSC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback