Asus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 410%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 533%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics373% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive463% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI  (all builds)
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '23 at 06:00
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$460
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 77.8
1-Core 200
2-Core 420
119% 233 Pts
4-Core 813
8-Core 1,584
142% 1,199 Pts
64-Core 3,572
221% 3,572 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,732
Nvidia(10DE 16F4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
373% Outstanding
Lighting 597
Reflection 540
Parallax 700
486% 612 fps
MRender 504
Gravity 545
Splatting 295
351% 448 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 373%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3035 2985 2955 2948 2946 2947 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
463% Outstanding
Read 2,748
Write 2,975
Mixed 2,811
SusWrite 2,969
650% 2,876 MB/s
4K Read 71.5
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 95.1
341% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,683
DQ Write 1338
DQ Mixed 1,500
1,125% 1,507 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 463%
Great: 508%
Crucial MX500 4TB-$269
1TB free
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 458 469 468 469 468 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 373
Write 461
Mixed 376
SusWrite 464
95% 418 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 56.5
194% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 143
167% 287 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
Crucial MX500 4TB-$269
1.5TB free
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 446 447 422 447 448 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 374
Write 456
Mixed 382
SusWrite 443
94% 414 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 56.4
193% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 99.9
146% 272 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 118%
Great: 119%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$130
858GB free
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2225 2230 2236 2236 2225 2258 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
369% Outstanding
Read 2,289
Write 179
Mixed 1,573
SusWrite 2235
350% 1,569 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 69
234% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,667
DQ Write 1,408
DQ Mixed 1,449
1,110% 1,508 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 369%
Great: 370%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B6400C32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
248% Outstanding
MC Read 176
MC Write 52.7
MC Mixed 64
279% 97.7 GB/s
SC Read 45.1
SC Write 57.6
SC Mixed 51.2
147% 51.3 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 148%
This bench: 248%
Great: 230%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 31.5" 1280 720 LEN61F2 LEN T32p-20
Typical ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 527%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $2,628
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback