Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82NJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82NJ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '23 at 07:01
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS Creator Edition
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 111
46% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 352
32% 271 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX450
Legend(17AA 3AAB) 2GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44.47
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 43.9
34% 37.4 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 42.6
Splatting 34.6
28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 32%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TDE9X084N 1TB
457GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41010C22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 935 735 913 951 960 950 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 1,144
Write 996
Mixed 974
SusWrite 907
226% 1,005 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 40.5
134% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 200
151% 206 MB/s
Poor: 213%
This bench: 152%
Great: 364%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 27
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 23.1
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 21 179 59 90 14" 1280 720 LEN8A90
Typical 82NJ Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82NJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback