Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

System	VMware, VMware Virtual Platform
Motherboard	Intel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130730
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '17 at 13:24
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Memory 74.7 1-Core 75.9 2-Core 149 59% 100 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 151 20% 152 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D 11,474 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Vmware(15AD 0405) 229MB Driver: vm3dum64.dll Ver. 8.14.1.24 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.09% Terrible	Lighting 0.17 Reflection 0.08 Parallax 0.06 0% 0.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 0.09% Great: 69%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 5GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4GB free Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.2% Below average	Read 33.8 Write 339 Mixed 353 56% 242 MB/s	4K Read 5.53 4K Write 8.54 4K Mixed 7.39 22% 7.15 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 81.4 DQ Mixed 84.5 77% 120 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 59%
Vmware Virtual disk 91GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 64 slots used 8GB DIMM DRAM Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	38.5% Below average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 12.5 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 6.7 23% 7.97 GB/s	Latency 91 44% 91 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	829x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325