Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST E5-MR9S
Memory121 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '23 at 19:43
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 181
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 732
65% 549 Pts
64-Core 1,616
100% 1,616 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
AMD(1002 0000) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.3% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 132
Parallax 196
102% 151 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 143
Splatting 88.5
92% 115 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme NX-1TB 2280 1TB
837GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.1.A.1S Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1718 1747 1737 1730 1713 1709 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,443
Write 1,746
Mixed 1,357
SusWrite 1,726
355% 1,568 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 42.2
142% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 407
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 178
174% 280 MB/s
Poor: 211%
This bench: 222%
Great: 495%
Nx-2tb 2280 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN10526
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1570 1451 1452 1454 1448 1452 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,268
Write 1,626
Mixed 1,358
SusWrite 1,471
324% 1,431 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 48
160% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 498
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 382
289% 393 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 208%
Great: 366%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown atermiter 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
135% Outstanding
MC Read 61.3
MC Write 55.4
MC Mixed 49.2
158% 55.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 17.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 135%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 0P 5R 9G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 13% 135 544 450 60 23.5" 1920 1080 AOC2470 2470W
History: Score 45: 0P 4R 7G 4B | Score 55: 0P 5R 9G 3B
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback