Lenovo 4284AU7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 4284AU7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4284AU7
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '17 at 16:27
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 59
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 145
53% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 388
42% 334 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000M
Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 312.69
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Lighting 6.77
Reflection 7.88
Parallax 5.56
6% 6.74 fps
MRender 8.29
Gravity 7.17
Splatting 7.35
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003LVM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 62
Write 53.3
Mixed 27.8
35% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.34
69% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 58%
WDC WD10 EZEX-75WN4A0 1TB
930GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.7% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 24.1
Mixed 25.5
33% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.19
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.34
84% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 54%
ST1000DM 003-9YN162 1TB
84GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 28
Write 24.5
Mixed 25.5
33% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.32
62% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 9905428-093.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.5% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.6
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback