Today's hottest deals

Asus ProArt Studiobook W7600Z3A_W7600Z3A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ProArt Studiobook W7600Z3A_W7600Z3A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK W7600Z3A
Memory53.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220907
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 12:45
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 56.6
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 197
62% 115 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 664
62% 515 Pts
64-Core 1,125
70% 1,125 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A3000 12GB Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 11B3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3696
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.5% Below average
Lighting 30.2
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 85.9
25% 48.9 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 74.1
Splatting 19.8
48% 64.5 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
785GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,348
Write 1,061
Mixed 1,076
258% 1,162 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 37.6
125% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 453
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 365
263% 345 MB/s
Poor: 187% Great: 464%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG88MEBSA095N 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 49.9
MC Write 46.6
MC Mixed 50.5
140% 49 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 19.5
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 121%
This bench: 121%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 29 7 120 16" 1707 1067 AUOE495
Typical ProArt Studiobook W7600Z3A_W7600Z3A Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Asus ProArt Studiobook W7600Z3A_W7600Z3A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback