Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 705 G4 DM 65W (TAA)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G4 DM 65W (TAA)  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83E9
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '23 at 17:21
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45% Average
Memory 38.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 173
56% 104 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 422
43% 349 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 83E9) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12042.9001
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.92% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 22.7
9% 14.9 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 13
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.92%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB70H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,208
Write 922
Mixed 562
198% 897 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 36.7
123% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 493
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 396
289% 382 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.2% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 2R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 15% 13 103 58 60 23.8" 1920 1080 DEL424A DELL SE2422H
Typical EliteDesk 705 G4 DM 65W (TAA) Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G4 DM 65W (TAA)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback