Asus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive584% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO  (all builds)
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '23 at 03:05
Run Duration365 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$520
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 80.1
1-Core 211
2-Core 409
121% 233 Pts
4-Core 819
8-Core 1,586
143% 1,203 Pts
64-Core 3,532
219% 3,532 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 117%
Great: 125%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$145
113GB free
Firmware: 620281WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,335
Write 4,542
Mixed 3,256
902% 4,044 MB/s
4K Read 71.9
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 92.3
354% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 2,111
DQ Write 1,997
DQ Mixed 2,068
1,549% 2,059 MB/s
Poor: 283% Great: 685%
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$145
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620281WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4819 4849 3294 2368 2355 2490 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
584% Outstanding
Read 4,653
Write 4,924
Mixed 3,396
SusWrite 3,363
918% 4,084 MB/s
4K Read 73.2
4K Write 250
4K Mixed 95.7
366% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,872
DQ Write 1,755
DQ Mixed 1,901
1,403% 1,842 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 584%
Great: 685%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
594GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3174 3174 1914 1791 1790 1788 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
424% Outstanding
Read 2,896
Write 3227
Mixed 3,005
SusWrite 2,272
643% 2,850 MB/s
4K Read 72.5
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 95.3
314% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,694
DQ Write 1,526
DQ Mixed 1,641
1,222% 1,620 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 424%
Great: 488%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
931GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3253 3245 3249 2582 1768 1741 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
461% Outstanding
Read 2930
Write 3,295
Mixed 3,052
SusWrite 2,640
673% 2,979 MB/s
4K Read 75.3
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 104
360% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,692
DQ Write 1,521
DQ Mixed 1,632
1,217% 1,615 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 461%
Great: 488%
Seagate Portable 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 129 131 128 129 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 97.6
Write 128
Mixed 69
SusWrite 127
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
275% Outstanding
MC Read 186
MC Write 63.6
MC Mixed 74.6
309% 108 GB/s
SC Read 44.1
SC Write 73.8
SC Mixed 57.6
167% 58.5 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 275%
Great: 275%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 23 165 0" 2560 1440
Typical ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback