bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory19.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 19.7GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemVMware, VMware20,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory16 GB free of 19.6992 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '23 at 02:56
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 45.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
64% 123 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 800
74% 616 Pts
64-Core 1979
122% 1979 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 9.17.5.1
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
42.5% Average
Lighting 29.9
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 165
24% 78.9 fps
MRender 93.9
Gravity 119
Splatting 77.4
78% 96.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 129GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 840
Write 730
Mixed 800
176% 790 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 18.7
59% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 0
43% 108 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 180%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-2048MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB Virtual RAM VMW-512MB Virtual RAM VMW-128MB Virtual RAM VMW-64MB Virtual RAM VMW-8MB Virtual RAM VMW-4MB 19GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 2048, 1024, 512, 128, 64, 8, 4 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 48.3
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 41.9
122% 42.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 13 60 0" 2560 1369 Default
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback