Today's hottest deals

Thunderobot 911XWildHunterG3XD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemThunderobot 911XWildHunterG3XD  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT NLXB
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230303
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 18:17
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 65
1-Core 162
2-Core 280
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 612
67% 530 Pts
64-Core 837
52% 837 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4050 (Laptop)
Quanta(152D 1518) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3667
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.9% Below average
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 65.4
24% 41.8 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 62.9
Splatting 63.9
61% 76.8 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 113%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL5-8D512 512GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EX92102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 86 106 109 115 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 486
Write 91.3
Mixed 156
SusWrite 103
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 18.7
63% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 71.9
DQ Mixed 181
126% 161 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 208%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 33.4
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 21.8
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 15.5" 1536 864 BOE0998
Typical 911XWildHunterG3XD Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

System: Thunderobot 911XWildHunterG3XD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback