bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU QEMU Virtual Machine
Motherboard
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '23 at 22:38
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Memory 37
1-Core 1.1
2-Core 2.4
13% 13.5 Pts
4-Core 44.4
8-Core 54.6
6% 49.5 Pts
64-Core 49.8
3% 49.8 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu NVMe Ctrl 86GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7.2.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1390 1012 1453 1415 1194 572 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 1,102
Write 1035
Mixed 1,095
SusWrite 1,173
249% 1,101 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 15.4
51% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 94.7
75% 104 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 136%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 0.1
MC Write 1.2
MC Mixed 7
8% 2.77 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 19
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 6 3 64 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback