| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
| Graphics | 236% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI (all builds) |
| Memory | 22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20220908 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 28 '23 at 21:42 |
| Run Duration | 99 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
117%
Outstanding
|
122% 238 Pts
|
141% 1,178 Pts
|
174% 2,811 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
MSI(1462 5091) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
236%
Outstanding
|
288% 351 fps
|
232% 296 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$96
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
454% 2,053 MB/s
|
300% 109 MB/s
|
837% 1,104 MB/s
| |
|
|
520% 2,335 MB/s
|
306% 111 MB/s
|
870% 1,132 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown F5-5600J2834F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
140%
Outstanding
|
140% 49.1 GB/s
|
151% 52.9 GB/s
|
48% 82.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 48: 0P 5R 5G 8B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48% | 34% | 53 | 360 | 60 | 144 | 31.5" | 2560 1440 | MSI1462 MSI MAG321CQR |
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 348 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD $359Bench 117%, 4,023 samples | 124x |
| Ryzen 7 7700XAMD $269Bench 112%, 4,548 samples | 55x |
| Ryzen 9 7950XAMD $549Bench 114%, 3,143 samples | 52x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 4090Nvidia $1,800Bench 370%, 25,956 samples | 61x |
| RTX 4070-TiNvidia $660Bench 240%, 46,082 samples | 47x |
| RTX 4080Nvidia $1,000Bench 290%, 22,998 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $2,328 |