Lenovo 81X7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics9.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81X7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '23 at 01:29
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Memory 27.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 180
52% 103 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 194
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F9D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1003
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.21% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 12.7
9% 11.3 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 12.6
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.21%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZALQ512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QFXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 722 855 681 603 545 546 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 495
Write 480
Mixed 228
SusWrite 659
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 16.9
4K Mixed 12.2
41% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 182
134% 175 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 220%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4AS016G-3200ST Micron MT40A512M16TB-062E:R 20GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 13.2
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 5.3
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 270
15% 270 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 41 55 24 0 14" 1280 720 AUO203D
Typical 81X7 Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81X7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback