Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI  (all builds)
Memory16.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '23 at 20:30
Run Duration76 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 75.6
1-Core 164
2-Core 326
99% 188 Pts
4-Core 635
8-Core 949
98% 792 Pts
64-Core 1,135
70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 29.5
18% 23.9 fps
MRender 16.4
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 21.1
17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKNU512GZ 512GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,720
Write 1,604
Mixed 1,390
350% 1,571 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 77.9
275% 99.1 MB/s
DQ Read 445
DQ Write 1,090
DQ Mixed 575
494% 703 MB/s
Poor: 116% Great: 286%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.C8FP Samsung M378A1G44BB0-CWE CT8G4DFRA32A.C8FP 24GB
3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.9% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.9
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 21
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 25 60 19.5" 1280 720 HWP332F HP 20kd
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI Builds (Compare 480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $507
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback