Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FAB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAsus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FAB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E1504FA
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230303
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 21 '23 at 16:41
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Memory 23.7
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 88.5
32% 58.3 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 134
16% 125 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 282D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.02
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 11.4
5% 9.37 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 6
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 195
Write 178
Mixed 178
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 8.7
37% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 97.8
DQ Mixed 161
122% 169 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNFA5MLYR-N6E 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 294
14% 294 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 40 60 15.5" 1536 864 SDC4161
Typical Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FAB Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FAB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback