HP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive557% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A96
Memory50.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 19:20
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$460
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 71.8
1-Core 226
2-Core 456
127% 251 Pts
4-Core 908
8-Core 1,758
158% 1333 Pts
64-Core 3,550
220% 3,550 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 121%
Great: 135%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
HP(103C 8A96) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3790
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
9.23% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 12
9% 12.9 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 11.5
10% 13.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.23%
Great: 10%
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
HP(103C 8B37) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.5% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 30
24% 30 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 30
Splatting 30
25% 30 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD_BLACK Gen4 SDCPNRY-1T00-1106 1TB
761GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4026 4093 4057 4066 2806 1300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
557% Outstanding
Read 3,598
Write 3,880
Mixed 3,105
SusWrite 3,391
788% 3,493 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 96.2
337% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 2,436
DQ Write 2,159
DQ Mixed 2,339
1,742% 2,311 MB/s
Poor: 219%
This bench: 557%
Great: 521%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
812GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8U0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 34,491
Mixed 69.7
12,347% 17,280 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
WD My Passport 259D 2TB
302GB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 32.2
Write 32.6
Mixed 23.9
37% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
58% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 43%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
485GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.7
Write 36.7
Mixed 26.8
42% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C36-16 HP52U40S8HM-16FRA KF552C36-16 HP52U40S8HM-16FRA 64GB
4800, 4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
137% Outstanding
MC Read 53.8
MC Write 52.6
MC Mixed 51.9
151% 52.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 47.9
SC Mixed 29.3
92% 32 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 137%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 30 0 21.5" 1280 720 ACR06AB SB220Q
Typical OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-1xxx Builds (Compare 444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $2,216
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback