Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	43.6% Average	Memory 53.7 1-Core 32.8 2-Core 74.3 34% 53.6 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 396 33% 288 Pts	64-Core 1,032 64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 70%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7KH480HAHQ-00005 480GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 409GB free (System drive) Firmware: HXM7404Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 330 Write 210 Mixed 209 55% 250 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 22 72% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 230 172% 230 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 123%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB 7,850 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 4GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 12.8 Write 3.3 Mixed 6 8% 7.37 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 41% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 8x16GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 8 of 24 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	85.2% Excellent	MC Read 40 MC Write 31.8 MC Mixed 34.4 101% 35.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 9.6 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 129%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16