Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 7840H 36 User benchmarks, average bench 85% FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 61.3 1-Core 127 2-Core 231 75% 140 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 773 71% 596 Pts	64-Core 1,274 79% 1,274 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M 1,815 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Legend(17AA 3C93) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.03.28 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Lighting 56.7 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 81.2 46% 46.1 fps	MRender 24 Gravity 77.2 Splatting 92.6 56% 64.6 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 53%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Umis RPJYJ512MKN1QWY 512GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 257% 379GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0L06A1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,311 Write 1,323 Mixed 1,186 284% 1,273 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 64.9 4K Mixed 25.2 123% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 654 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 590 399% 495 MB/s
Poor: 176% Great: 326%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 2x8GB 5,024 User benchmarks, average bench 130% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	86.6% Excellent	MC Read 37.6 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 41.1 97% 33.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 17.8 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 146%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Nuclear submarine

CPU
Ryzen 7 7840HSAMDBench 84%, 1,015 samples	47x
Ryzen 5 7640HSAMDBench 75%, 197 samples	11x

GPU
RTX 4050 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 96%, 5,690 samples	21x
RTX 4060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 113%, 18,525 samples	13x
Radeon 780MAMDBench 36%, 1,815 samples	11x

SSD
MTFDKCD512TFK 512GBMicronBench 211%, 1,655 samples	15x
LS KIOXIA 512GBKbg50znt512gBench 197%, 505 samples	13x
MTFDKCD512QFM-1BD1AABLA 512GBMicronBench 174%, 1,136 samples	5x

RAM
M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 2x8GBSamsungBench 130%, 5,024 samples	13x
HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GBHynixBench 129%, 4,442 samples	8x
M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 1x8GBSamsungBench 67%, 559 samples	7x