Today's hottest deals

HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive368% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemHP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88EE
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220810
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 18:02
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 80.6
1-Core 152
2-Core 295
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 837
87% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,041
64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 88EE) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.40.26
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 109
Parallax 30.1
17% 53.3 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 22.7
17% 20.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix PC711 HFS001TDE9X073N 1TB
835GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2307 2289 2475 2163 1515 1511 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
368% Outstanding
Read 2,769
Write 2,640
Mixed 1,761
SusWrite 2,044
517% 2,304 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 86.4
285% 98.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,072
DQ Write 911
DQ Mixed 977
736% 987 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 368%
Great: 368%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
70% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 25.3
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 40.4
SC Mixed 27.5
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx Builds (Compare 2,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback