Today's hottest deals

HP Elite SFF 600 G9 Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics8.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive326% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemHP Elite SFF 600 G9 Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8951
Memory55.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '23 at 02:26
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500-$189
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 74.4
1-Core 185
2-Core 345
106% 202 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 994
97% 794 Pts
64-Core 1,225
76% 1,225 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
HP(103C 8951) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
8.34% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 10.5
8% 11.3 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 10.1
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.34%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BH1 512GB
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NGXH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2650 1127 942 952 966 958 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
326% Outstanding
Read 2,644
Write 2,734
Mixed 2,435
SusWrite 1,266
510% 2,270 MB/s
4K Read 72.7
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 90.2
281% 88.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,143
DQ Write 1,324
DQ Mixed 1,198
912% 1,222 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 326%
Great: 400%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108
578GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2916 2863 3011 2888 1557 1565 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
376% Outstanding
Read 2,256
Write 2,598
Mixed 2,498
SusWrite 2,467
555% 2,454 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 73.2
254% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,358
DQ Write 1,198
DQ Mixed 1,339
987% 1,298 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 376%
Great: 477%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT32G48C40U5.M16A1 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
135% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 54.7
MC Mixed 50.1
147% 51.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 47.7
SC Mixed 29.7
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 135%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Elite SFF 600 G9 Desktop PC Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Elite SFF 600 G9 Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback