bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 17:11
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 145
56% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 508
48% 399 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla M60
Nvidia(10DE 115E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1295 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 79.6
Parallax 68.8
56% 72.3 fps
MRender 54.8
Gravity 71.1
Splatting 72
55% 66 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 137GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 99 79 134 142 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 362
Write 146
Mixed 284
SusWrite 109
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 10.9
36% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 90
DQ Mixed 53.1
56% 93.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 84%
Vmware Virtual disk 1.5TB
701GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 120 79 133 140 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 329
Write 218
Mixed 300
SusWrite 124
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 11.1
36% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 92.8
DQ Mixed 34.9
49% 92.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 128 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 30.5
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.9
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback