Lenovo 82JQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82JQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220616
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '23 at 11:44
Run Duration79 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 78.3
1-Core 152
2-Core 279
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 839
85% 691 Pts
64-Core 929
58% 929 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3A80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.99
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.5% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 120
Parallax 113
97% 117 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 92.6
Splatting 82.7
82% 103 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HBJD-00BL2 256GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L2QFXM7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,373
Write 849
Mixed 1,027
240% 1,083 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 57.2
175% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 833
DQ Write 649
DQ Mixed 530
454% 671 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.5% Very good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 26.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 28.3
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82JQ Builds (Compare 3,680 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

System: Lenovo 82JQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback