Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8 GAMING
Memory59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211213
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 25 '23 at 18:15
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 173
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 611
54% 458 Pts
64-Core 1,352
84% 1,352 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.2.1
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.4% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 139
Parallax 201
99% 154 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 140
Splatting 94.6
94% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
517GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1458 1492 1495 1572 1570 1564 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,353
Write 1,612
Mixed 1,448
SusWrite 1,525
336% 1,485 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 47.4
153% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 304
225% 300 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 208%
Great: 365%
Adata SU750 256GB
36GB free
Firmware: XA001R29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 402 401 404 410 409 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 366
Mixed 386
SusWrite 404
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 39.5
129% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 275
208% 281 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CRC M393A2G40DB1-CRC M393A2G40DB1-CRC M393A2G40EB1-CRC 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
109% Outstanding
MC Read 47.2
MC Write 46.3
MC Mixed 37.9
125% 43.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 17.9
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback