Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6226R 69 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	80% Very good	Memory 77.4 1-Core 111 2-Core 219 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 892 79% 667 Pts	64-Core 4,144 256% 4,144 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX A4000 4,246 User benchmarks, average bench 132% Nvidia(10DE 14AD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 536.25 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	Lighting 187 Reflection 201 Parallax 183 153% 190 fps	MRender 194 Gravity 142 Splatting 141 128% 159 fps
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 137%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kxg60znv1t02 TOSHIBA 1TB 1,346 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 834GB free (System drive) Firmware: AGGA4104 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,859 Write 2,095 Mixed 1,521 408% 1,825 MB/s	4K Read 43.7 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 52.6 188% 66.7 MB/s	DQ Read 884 DQ Write 603 DQ Mixed 752 559% 747 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 304%
Seagate ST2000NM000B-2TD100 2TB 1.5TB free Firmware: TN02 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 220 Write 204 Mixed 139 139% 188 MB/s	4K Read 45.6 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.4 2,146% 17.3 MB/s

Seagate ST2000NM000B-2TD100 2TB 2TB free Firmware: TN02 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 17,267 Mixed 200 6,250% 8,734 MB/s	4K Read 49.2 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.9 2,363% 18.9 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A4K40EB3-CWE 4x31.8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 123% 4 of 16 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.7% Above average	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 18.4 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.2 21% 7.43 GB/s	Latency 85.5 47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 258%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 165%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 225%

UFO

CPU
Xeon W-3265IntelBench 81%, 6 samples	2x

GPU
RTX A6000NvidiaBench 205%, 738 samples	2x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $103Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	2x

RAM
M393A4K40EB3-CWE 8x31.9GBSamsungBench 276%, 25 samples	2x

Value: 40% - Average

Total price: $103