TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory15.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15.6GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory11.9 GB free of 15.625 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1377 x 822 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '23 at 01:58
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6242R
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 906
80% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,736
107% 1,736 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 77.1%
 Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID T4-16Q
Nvidia(10DE 1310) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 452.77
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 49%
 Great: 61%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 86GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 141 121 112 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 147
Mixed 156
SusWrite 130
118% 158 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 3.8
743% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 95.3%
 Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
75.5% Very good
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 34.1
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 6.1
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 75.5%
 Great: 126%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 53201stBench 47%, 5 samples4x
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 63461stBench 64%, 4 samples3x
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6242R1stBench 62%, 8 samples2x
GPU
A16-2BNvidiaBench 32%, 22 samples2x
A40-8QNvidiaBench 46%, 13 samples2x
A16-1BNvidiaBench 30%, 10 samples2x
RAM
Hat 2x16GBRedBench 78%, 105 samples5x
Hat 1x8GBRedBench 58%, 330 samples5x
Hat 4x16GBRedBench 91%, 50 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback