User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemSITA
MotherboardIntel DH77DF
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130305
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 18 '23 at 23:11
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 25.5
2-Core 68.7
40% 57.5 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 158
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 4
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S120-240GB 240GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09628
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 118 39 125 42 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 345
Write 166
Mixed 106
SusWrite 85.2
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 20.2
77% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 27.2
DQ Write 41.8
DQ Mixed 24.4
21% 31.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
417GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 98 105 102 107 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 97.4
Mixed 49
SusWrite 103
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M379B5273DH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.7% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 11.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback