Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 1,838 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 79.5 2-Core 152 62% 104 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 516 49% 404 Pts	64-Core 720 44% 720 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310 4,920 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 1154) 1GB CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.22% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.47 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.22% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
OSSD001TBQSS2 1TB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 537GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0121A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 175 7.9 8.5 8.9 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 408 Write 11.2 Mixed 14.2 SusWrite 63.2 26% 124 MB/s	4K Read 43.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 65% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 89%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB 1,688 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 5.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 154 145 153 139 145 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 215 Write 160 Mixed 55.4 SusWrite 148 105% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GR7MFR4N-UH 4x16GB 163 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	97.2% Outstanding	MC Read 42.6 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 34.6 110% 38.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 16.8 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 125%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	113x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	101x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	97x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	146x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	116x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	62x

SSD
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	50x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	33x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	33x

RAM
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	45x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	38x
HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 61%, 375 samples	34x

Value: 16% - Very poor

Total price: $509

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16