Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '15 at 09:49
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 95.6 2-Core 175 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 486 50% 405 Pts	64-Core 481 30% 481 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 FA77) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4256 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.61% Terrible	Lighting 3.63 Reflection 6.04 Parallax 5.75 3% 5.14 fps	MRender 8.19 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 7.09 5% 5.85 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.61% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GCSU 512GB 1,378 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 356GB free (System drive) Firmware: JURA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1922 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 615 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AD) Unknown 197 197 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 28 (C2) HDA temperature 71 44 240518955037 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	61% Good	Read 261 Write 237 Mixed 254 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 39.8 4K Mixed 30.3 88% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 118 106% 159 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 107%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GB-$167 1,242 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 225GB free Firmware: HTTAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3150 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1111 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 183 183 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 48 (C2) HDA temperature 56 29 304943530028 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	92.7% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 420 Mixed 477 104% 466 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 36.1 116% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 124 124% 201 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 92%
Hitachi HTS541515A9E630 1.5TB 2,360 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free Firmware: KA0OA500 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 122 122 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1468 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 3148 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1111 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 65545 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 79376 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 227634053150 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	52% Above average	Read 83.8 Write 97.4 Mixed 91.8 69% 91 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.16 63% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 59%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB 18,744 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1.5TB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Read 50.5 Write 46.8 Mixed 45.8 61% 47.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.21 62% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 42%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1.5TB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1TB free, PID 0b1a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 97.7 Write 93.2 Mixed 65.1 106% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.16 57% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 4x8GB 1,917 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.9% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 15.1 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 18.1 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical QOSMIO X70-A Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	197x
Core i7-4810MQIntel $400Bench 62%, 26,927 samples	4x
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	138x
GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples	61x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	3x

SSD
HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GBToshiba $167Bench 71%, 1,242 samples	50x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
840 Evo 1TBSamsung $199Bench 105%, 23,857 samples	6x

RAM
M471B1G73CB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 128 samples	21x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,157 samples	17x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16