HP EliteBook 840 G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 896D
Memory34 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221230
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMay 10 '23 at 12:19
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 47.7
1-Core 150
2-Core 203
73% 134 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 563
58% 467 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 896D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 22.4
14% 19.1 fps
MRender 21.7
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 18.4
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 803 733 807 1070 932 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 982
Write 520
Mixed 823
SusWrite 869
179% 798 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 42
126% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 153
118% 166 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 140%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC16C2085S1SC48BA1 Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CQKOD 63GB
4800, 4800 MHz
32767, 32767 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 33.6
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 157%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: HP EliteBook 840 G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback