| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Supermicro X9DR3-F (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X9DR3-F |
| Memory | 37.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 7680 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150709 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 04 '23 at 07:31 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
68.1%
Good
|
62% 104 Pts
|
53% 440 Pts
|
90% 1,458 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3080-$730
Asus(1043 882E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
162%
Outstanding
|
179% 241 fps
|
175% 222 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 122 129 128 128 128 MB/s
|
66.8%
Good
|
75% 335 MB/s
|
95% 31.2 MB/s
|
181% 249 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
171GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 117 117 121 120 120 MB/s
|
73%
Very good
|
77% 105 MB/s
|
150% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 6x8GB
6 of 16 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
63.5%
Good
|
71% 24.9 GB/s
|
24% 8.27 GB/s
|
48% 82.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X9DR3-F Builds (Compare 53 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X9DR3-F
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 7x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples | 6x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 66%, 741 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $200 |