Today's hottest deals

Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBlade Shadow Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardBlade ShadowM
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '23 at 22:27
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7543P 32-Core
CPU1 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 65.5
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 164
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 390
44% 346 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A4500
Nvidia(10DE 163C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 20GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 195
Reflection 190
Parallax 222
159% 202 fps
MRender 246
Gravity 160
Splatting 154
149% 187 fps
Poor: 133%
This bench: 145%
Great: 155%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 111 116 119 116 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Blade EHSN0EG2AIGF32-F88 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 33.2
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 21.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback