Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	12.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5640 683 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 63.5 1-Core 71.4 2-Core 145 54% 93.2 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 532 48% 403 Pts	64-Core 516 32% 516 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 5000 751 User benchmarks, average bench 10% HP(103C 0770) 2.5GB CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 747 MHz, Ram: 2.5GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Lighting 11.4 Reflection 21.4 Parallax 14.6 9% 15.8 fps	MRender 21.7 Gravity 10.2 Splatting 14.6 12% 15.5 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85 5,005 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 97 113 30 6.4 10 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12.9% Very poor	Read 58.2 Write 48.7 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 54.7 11% 47.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 21.1 4K Mixed 3.2 18% 8.7 MB/s	DQ Read 52.7 DQ Write 34.1 DQ Mixed 11.3 17% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 93%
Hitachi HUS726060ALE610 6TB 140 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 3.5TB free Firmware: T7MH SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 209 203 206 214 209 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 189 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 209 123% 169 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 121%
CT500MX5 00SSD1 500GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 118% 110GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Read 56.5 Write 25 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 26.6 42% 34.2 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 6.3 311% 6.43 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 170%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 74GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.8% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 16.5 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.5 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	298x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	273x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	253x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16