ECS MF51RL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardECS MF51RL  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230328
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateApr 26 '23 at 09:02
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i5-1334U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 66.8
1-Core 178
2-Core 325
100% 190 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 875
85% 697 Pts
64-Core 683
42% 683 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Elitegroup(1019 9873) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3959
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 13.2
9% 13.8 fps
MRender 18.2
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 14.7
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison PM8256GPMCB47ECS-E13T2 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM90.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 642 835 737 658 434 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
141% Outstanding
Read 895
Write 1,182
Mixed 912
SusWrite 554
200% 886 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 46.6
175% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 555
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 398
298% 404 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 141%
Great: 208%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kimtigo (HK) Limited KT4GS4NE8 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 31.6
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 22.1
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MF51RL Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: ECS MF51RL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback