HP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87FE
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221018
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 23 '23 at 18:25
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 60
1-Core 143
2-Core 246
80% 150 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 533
61% 476 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 87FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 20.3
13% 18.8 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 14.8
14% 18.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1006 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 845 987 939 997 813 818 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,508
Write 974
Mixed 964
SusWrite 900
243% 1,087 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 39
146% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 367
266% 353 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 175%
Great: 445%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S8MR-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.4% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 19.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 13.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15s-fq2xxx Builds (Compare 2,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback