Monster ABRA A5 V19.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V19.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V19.2
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '23 at 16:29
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 46.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 147
57% 101 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 279
31% 244 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1D05 1179) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3887
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.42% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 9.3
6% 8.17 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 9
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.42%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00B07 512GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC7002Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 828 763 1222 1318 1972 1909 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 664
Write 603
Mixed 591
SusWrite 1,335
181% 798 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 15.1
50% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 572
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 520
373% 485 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 144%
Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 23.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.6
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V19.2 Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

System: Monster ABRA A5 V19.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback