Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 268%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive427% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 23:55
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$522
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 78.8
1-Core 216
2-Core 432
124% 242 Pts
4-Core 842
8-Core 1,116
124% 979 Pts
64-Core 3753
232% 3753 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 117%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$520
Nvidia(10DE 17FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 265
Reflection 264
Parallax 272
216% 267 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 245
Splatting 192
208% 264 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 191%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$158
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2339 2356 2430 2513 2454 2517 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
427% Outstanding
Read 2,380
Write 2,534
Mixed 2,462
SusWrite 2,435
554% 2,453 MB/s
4K Read 69.9
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 101
345% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,827
DQ Write 1,602
DQ Mixed 1,709
1,282% 1,713 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 427%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$158
2TB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1196 1240 1275 1272 1257 1274 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 1367
Write 1,332
Mixed 849
SusWrite 1,252
270% 1,200 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 98.6
318% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,532
DQ Write 1,414
DQ Mixed 1,887
1,302% 1,611 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 296%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-7600J3646G16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
134% Outstanding
MC Read 50.2
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 46.4
134% 47 GB/s
SC Read 52.6
SC Write 55.6
SC Mixed 48.7
149% 52.3 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 134%
Great: 231%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $2,171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback