Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6320-$165 1,734 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 85.2 1-Core 97 2-Core 175 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 260 34% 257 Pts	64-Core 261 16% 261 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240 11,020 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 8335) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	3.3% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 2.6 4% 3.3 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 2.1 3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.3% Great: 5%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ510000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 379 Write 288 Mixed 257 68% 308 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 16.5 58% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 89.3 DQ Mixed 43.9 49% 83 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 55%
Kingston SKC600512G 512GB 5,390 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 465GB free Firmware: S4500105 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 445 Write 368 Mixed 364 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 32.6 117% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 193 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 130 105% 149 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 130%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 7GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 125 Write 9.7 Mixed 17.8 42% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 37% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE 8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17.1 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 16.9 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16